There are few books you put down and immediately want to reread. Gardens of the Moon[US] [UK] is one of those books for two reasons. One, it's that good. Two, it's that confusing.On a reread I already know I missed a lot the first time, but I quickly realized I missed SOOOO much that first time and most of it is because I wasn't used to having to use my brain as much. I was constantly amazed at how much foreshadowing is in this first book. So much is mentioned from the origins of the T'lan Imass and Tiste Andii to the Jaghut and even a little about the Forkrul Assail.
And the epigraphs made sense! They ACTUALLY made sense! I always thought they might, but they are tell quite a bit in fact. Some I was amazed actually give away events in the following chapter, but you have no idea when you first read it. You wily bastard, Erikson!
Hand in hand with the foreshadowing I'm amazed at the level of detail in this book, there's hardly a sentence without extra meanings behind it. But the problem is - you just don't know who to trust when you're going through this on your first time and it's so hard to catch it when so much is revealed in such an offhand manner.
I still remember being so confused the first time and then figuring something out. That's what sold me on the series and why I still consider it one of the best, if not the best out there. A second reading sealed the deal.
Having said that I also saw a lot of why people say it's the least well-written of the series. It's well done, leaps and bounds ahead of most I think, but it can be inconsistent. For most of the series it's told in third person limited, and while that seems to have been attempted for most of this book, there were instances where it drifts to omniscient within a section. The pacing is also a bit off, but that's not really any different from the rest either.
Despite that, I stick with what I said above. These complaints are drops in the bucket compared to this vast, epic tale filled with history and magic and plans within plans.
At the moment, The Malazan Book of the Fallen is my all-time favorite series. This may or may not change when George finishes his series (in 2113, zing!), but I have a hard time right now seeing how it will be possible to top. Yes, there's a similar level of detail and even camaraderie you feel with some of the characters, but how do you top this kind of epic? I don't think there's a better feeling in reading than figuring something out that the author withheld, that's what sold me on my first read and what continues to make this my favorite.
5 out of 5 Stars (Not even a second thought)
Note: I also highly recommend reading this with a group, or just checking out the discussions from the group read I've been participating in. Being able to toss around ideas and theories is priceless and having people to explain some of it is also very helpful especially if it's not as rewarding for you to figure things out on your own.
8 comments:
Erikson is an author that I consistently hear this kind of praise for from readers who have fallen just as you have. I have this vague idea that I may have read a short work of his in the past but have not read any of his novels and really should go ahead and grab this first one and get it on my pile at least.
Honestly, most everything pales in comparison. Every time I pick up a book of his, I'm blown away. The writing is top notch and everything is so mysterious, I can't help but be excited.
I've been debating on whether or not to give this series a second try. I made it to book 4 last time and then moved on. It was just getting overwhelming but I think if and when I give it a second go I'll have a lot more resources online to help me keep track of everything. What I did read I loved though;)
Yeah, I remember getting a bit overwhelmed especially since books 1-5 are all about introducing new races and peoples and it isn't till book 6 that things come together and actually follow one story line (for the most part).
I think it's a little strange, and maybe not perfectly structured (though sometimes it does come together in impressive ways), but reads like a normal fantasy adventure in a setting like D&D, where also not everything might be clear to an outsider, but where you can take a lot of things in stride...
I don't think it even needs to mentioned as "difficult", because if you find this dificult, I don't know what you might find not difficult... It seems to be a psychological effect of estrangement (hey, explain this more! that was unexpected) more than any inherent difficulty of following the overt story of the characters in each volume.
I always love finding what I missed the first tinme around. This one is still on my shelf unread haha
Pabkins @ My Shelf Confessions
I found this novel very deep, sometimes too deep to fully comprehend for me, starting to piece more together by end of Deadhouse Gates and Memories of Ice was one of my favourite fantasy reads of a few years ago, keep meaning to pick up House of Chains still haven't yet, now I've read your review this is going to top of my reading list (well - maybe after Bitter Seeds), does reading the Ian C Esslemont novels add greatly to the series or would you simply recommend just the Erikson storylines Seak ?
House of Chains is a bit of a let down after Memories of Ice. Not that it's not good, it's excellent, it's just that MoI is my favorite in the series.
Esslemont definitely adds a lot to the series. It's not all necessary I don't think although I've only read 2 so far, but I know there are events in Toll the Hounds that are really glossed over that are kind of a big deal and dealt with in Return of the Crimson Guard.
Post a Comment